Review Proccess
All submitted articles will first be reviewed by the editorial staff. Manuscripts submitted by authors will be checked for plagiarism using Turnitin software. Manuscripts with a plagiarism rate exceeding 25% will be immediately rejected and returned to the authors. Articles that do not meet the journal's criteria will be rejected without external review.
Each submitted manuscript will undergo a peer review process (single-blind review). The reviewers and authors will keep each other's identities confidential. The review process will be conducted online, and the results will be communicated to the authors via email.
Before publication, each submitted article will go through the following editorial processes:
-
Pre-Review: This stage involves checking the manuscript's template, running a plagiarism check using Turnitin, and assessing the article's suitability. Articles that do not meet the journal's criteria will be rejected, while those that do will proceed to the evaluation stage by reviewers. If significant similarity is detected, the manuscript will be rejected.
-
Review: This stage involves evaluating the manuscript's substance, novelty, and analysis. Reviewers will recommend whether the article should be rejected, revised, or accepted. The review outcomes may include acceptance without revision, acceptance with minor revisions, acceptance with major revisions, or rejection. The maximum review period is one month from the date of manuscript submission.
-
Final Decision: The editor will make the final decision based on the reviewers' comments. Authors of accepted articles with revisions are expected to make the necessary changes within the time frame specified by the editorial team.