Nilai-Nilai Pancasila sebagai Solusi Konflik Suporter dalam Dunia Sepak Bola Indonesia

Hanifah Syafiqah Nafisah; M Zainul Hafizi

doi:10.62238/chatra.v3i1.148

Authors

Hanifah Syafiqah Nafisah Pendidikan Kepelatihan Olahraga, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia Author
M Zainul Hafizi Pendidikan IPS, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8166-9031

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62238/chatra.v3i1.148

Keywords:

suporter, konflik sosial, Pancasila

Abstract

Konflik antar suporter sepak bola di Indonesia, seperti antara Arema FC dan Persebaya Surabaya, mencerminkan dampak fanatisme berlebihan yang berujung pada kekerasan dan perpecahan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dinamika konflik suporter melalui pendekatan studi pustaka, serta menganalisis relevansi nilai-nilai Pancasila sebagai solusi etis dan edukatif dalam menciptakan atmosfer pertandingan yang damai. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa teori identitas sosial dan teori konflik dapat menjelaskan kecenderungan perilaku eksklusif kelompok suporter. Penerapan nilai-nilai Pancasila—terutama kemanusiaan, persatuan, dan keadilan sosial—memiliki potensi besar dalam menumbuhkan toleransi, mengurangi ketegangan, dan membentuk budaya sportivitas yang inklusif. Kesimpulannya, pendekatan berbasis nilai terbukti lebih konstruktif dibandingkan pendekatan represif. Oleh karena itu, integrasi nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam pendidikan suporter dan kebijakan klub menjadi langkah strategis untuk mencegah konflik serupa di masa mendatang.

References

Adila, A. C., Taufiq, A., & Sofyan, N. H. (2023). KH Abdurrahman Wahid’s Study: Revitalization of the Meaning of Just and Civilized Humanity. Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v7i1.7939

Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224

Ariyanto, K. (2014). Analyzing the Conflict between Football Organizations in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.450

Berendt, J., & Uhrich, S. (2018). Rivalry and fan aggression: why acknowledging conflict reduces tension between rival fans and downplaying makes things worse. European Sport Management Quarterly, 18(4), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1424226

Coser, L. A. (1964). Functions of Social Conflict. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Farouq, U., Kertawidana, I., & Simatupang, H. (2022). Pancasila as the Foundation of the Defense of the State in the Face of the Threat of Distegration of the Indonesian Nation. Randwick International of Social Science Journal, 3(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.47175/rissj.v3i1.382

Ganes Harpendya, Sumantri, S. H., & Wahyudi, B. (2022). Pendidikan perdamaian: sebuah urgensi di tengah maraknya konflik sosial berdimensi suku, agama, ras, dan antar-golongan di indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 21(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v21i2.26488

Hessert, B. (2022). The exchange of self-incriminating information of athletes between sports organisations and law enforcement. The International Sports Law Journal, 22(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-021-00194-y

Lam, S., Shum, K. K., Chan, W. W. L., & Tsoi, E. W. S. (2021). Acceptance of outgroup members in schools: Developmental trends and roles of perceived norm of prejudice and teacher support. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 676–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12387

Lestrelin, L. (2020). Par le détour de l’humour. Terrain. https://doi.org/10.4000/terrain.20858

Lexy J. Moleong. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif : Edisi Revisi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. Bantam.

López-Gajardo, M. Á., Díaz-García, J., Ramírez-Bravo, I., Ponce-Bordón, J. C., & Leo, F. M. (2022). Relación entre los Conflictos Intra-Grupo y el Rendimiento en Deportes Colectivos: Efecto Mediador de la Eficacia Colectiva. Cuadernos de Psicología Del Deporte, 22(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.6018/cpd.473361

Newson, M., White, F., & Whitehouse, H. (2023). Does loving a group mean hating its rivals? Exploring the relationship between ingroup cohesion and outgroup hostility among soccer fans. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21(4), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2022.2084140

Oshimi, D., Yamaguchi, S., Fukuhara, T., & Tagami, Y. (2022). Calculating the Social Return on Investment of a Japanese Professional Soccer Team’s Corporate Social Responsibility Activities. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.736595

Stura, C., & Johnston, L. M. (2018). Cross-cultural conflicts within sports teams. Journal of Peace Education, 15(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2017.1409199

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Political Psychology (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16

Tentero, R. (2023). Pancasila Revitalization for the Enforcement of Non-Discriminatory Principle of Global Business Competition to Small Entrepreneurs. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i3.12836

Wen Lee, C.-, & Ande, T. (2022). Pancasila Has the Ability to Improve Community, Nation, and State Life in the Twenty-First Century. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 1(8), 1041–1047. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v1i8.120

Zed, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.