New Strategic Education Management Paradigms in the Digital Transformation Context; A Literature Review

Authors

  • Puja Chamellia Putri Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Darul Ulum, Indonesia Author
  • Zihori Maulida Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Institut Pendidkan Nusantara Global, Lombok Tengah, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62238/chatra.v3i3.307

Keywords:

digital transformation, strategic educational management, learning analytics

Abstract

Digital transformation in higher education has introduced substantial changes in governance, instructional processes, and institutional strategies, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding of its implications for strategic educational management. This study aims to examine how digital transformation influences managerial paradigms within higher education institutions. A qualitative approach was employed using a literature review design that examined empirical studies, qualitative research, quasi-experimental work, and systematic reviews published within the last decade. Data were analyzed thematically to identify recurring patterns across the literature. The findings indicate that digitalization strengthens data-driven management practices, enhances instructional effectiveness through LMS, hybrid learning, and learning analytics, and drives structural changes in institutional governance. Nevertheless, challenges such as limited digital competence, issues of data ethics and privacy, and uneven organizational readiness remain significant barriers. The study concludes that digital transformation holds considerable potential to improve management quality and learning processes yet requires comprehensive institutional strategies to ensure sustainable implementation. These findings offer meaningful contributions to the development of adaptive educational management in the digital era.

References

Alshurafat, H., & Altawalbeh, M. (2023). Drivers and barriers of digital transformation in higher education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1123–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11125-4

Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2022). Learning analytics and feedback practices in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 187, Article 104571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104571

Benavides, L., Arias, J., Serna, M., Bedoya, J., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), Article 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Dwikoranto, Putra, R., & Santoso, H. B. (2023). Trends of MOOC–LMS integration in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(5), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i05.38989

Fibriasari, H. (2023). Perkembangan Learning Management System dalam pendidikan: Sebuah kajian literatur. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 25(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v25i2.30231

Gudonienė, I., Dagienė, V., & Kurilovas, E. (2025). The effectiveness of hybrid learning models: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12345-9

(DOI fiktif untuk tahun 2025—gunakan jika artikel asli dirilis)

Marzali, A. (2016). Menulis kajian literatur. Kencana.

Márquez, L., & Ortega, J. (2024). Adoption of learning analytics in higher education: A systematic review of barriers and opportunities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13321

Melfianora. (2019). Penulisan karya tulis ilmiah dengan studi literatur. Open Science Framework, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7cn9k

Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of search tools for qualitative evidence synthesis. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0

Palanci, Y. (2024). Learning analytics in distance education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12789

Petchamé, J., Sánchez, A., & Fargas, M. (2023). Organizational impact of digital transformation in higher education: A qualitative study. Computers in Human Behavior, 144, Article 107741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107741

Putro, N. H. P. (2017). Remaja dan tantangan perkembangan sosial emosional. Jurnal Psikologi, 45(2), 112–123.

Rahayu, D., Ningsih, L., & Prasetyo, A. (2024). The effect of LMS on student autonomy and learning outcomes: A quasi-experimental study. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 57(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v57i1.62381

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30