ISSN
ADDITIONAL MENU
ARTICLE TEMPLATE
GSCHOLAR CITATION
IN ASSOCIATION WITH
TOOLS
ANALISIS SITASI
VISITOR STATISTICS
Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
CODEX: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi maintains the standard of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.
All manuscripts submitted to this journal must follow Focus and Scope and Author Guidelines of this journal. The submitted manuscripts to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 1 (one) or more expert reviewers from Peer-Reviewers Team. The reviewers give valuable comments to the manuscript. The review uses double-blind peer review before the journal is published
All articles published in CODEX: Library and Information Science journal undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:
- All research articles are reviewed by at least suitably qualified experts.
- All publication decisions are made by the journal's Editor-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided.
- Members of the Editorial Boards lend insight, advice and guidance to the Editor-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions
- Members of the Editorial Boards provide the administrative support that allows CODEX: Library and Information Science Journal to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers and editors alike.
Peer review of referred papers:
Editors of CODEX: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.
Peer review of novel submissions:
Articles submitted directly to CODEX: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi will be fully peer-reviewed by at least an appropriately qualified expert in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.
Editors will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.
