Wizer.me-Based Social Studies Worksheets with Think Pair Share Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skill

Authors

  • Zona Anggraini Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Indonesia Author
  • Sekar Purbarini Kawuryan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sleman, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62238/jupsi.v4i2.461

Keywords:

critical thinking skills, social studies, think pair share, wizer.me

Abstract

This study developed a Wizer.me based Social Studies worksheet integrated with the Think Pair Share model for Grade VI students and examined its feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness in supporting critical thinking skills. Research and development was conducted using the ADDIE model. Content and media experts evaluated product feasibility, while practicality was assessed through one to one, small group, and field trials. Effectiveness was examined using a quasi experimental pretest and posttest control group design involving two classes of 20 students. The worksheet addressed “Stories about Our Indonesia” through videos, images, interactive questions, and structured think, pair, and share activities. Content validation reached 72.92%, media validation 82.81%, and the descriptive mean 77.67%. Student practicality reached 85.26%, while teacher practicality reached 100%. The experimental group achieved an N gain of 0.724, compared with 0.599 in the control group, with significant differences in posttest, gain, and N gain. These findings indicate that the integrated intervention was feasible, practical, and associated with stronger critical thinking improvement than the control condition, supporting structured digital learning in elementary Social Studies classrooms.

Penelitian ini mengembangkan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik IPS berbasis Wizer.me yang terintegrasi dengan model Think Pair Share untuk peserta didik kelas VI serta menguji kelayakan, kepraktisan, dan keefektifannya dalam mendukung keterampilan berpikir kritis. Penelitian dan pengembangan dilaksanakan menggunakan model ADDIE. Kelayakan produk dinilai oleh ahli materi dan ahli media, sedangkan kepraktisan diuji melalui tahap one to one, small group, dan field trial. Keefektifan diuji menggunakan desain kuasi eksperimen pretest dan posttest dengan kelompok kontrol yang melibatkan dua kelas, masing masing terdiri atas 20 peserta didik. LKPD memuat materi “Cerita tentang Indonesia Kita” melalui video, gambar, soal interaktif, serta aktivitas think, pair, dan share yang terstruktur. Validasi materi mencapai 72,92%, validasi media 82,81%, dan rerata deskriptif 77,67%. Kepraktisan peserta didik mencapai 85,26%, sedangkan kepraktisan guru mencapai 100%. Kelompok eksperimen memperoleh N gain 0,724, dibandingkan 0,599 pada kelompok kontrol, dengan perbedaan signifikan pada posttest, gain, dan N gain. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa intervensi terintegrasi tersebut layak, praktis, dan berkaitan dengan peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis yang lebih kuat dibandingkan kondisi kontrol dalam pembelajaran IPS kelas VI sekolah dasar.

References

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Banks, J. A. (1990). Teaching strategies for the social studies. Longman.

Barr, R. D., Barth, J. L., & Shermis, S. S. (1977). Defining the social studies. National Council for the Social Studies.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.

Cooper, F. (2018). A modification of Think Pair Share to make it more learner-centered by using student-generated questions. College Teaching, 66(1), 34–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2017.1390438

Dewi, N. A., Purnamasari, R., & Karmila, N. (2023). Pengembangan E-LKPD berbasis website Wizer.me materi sifat-sifat bangun ruang. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(2), 2562–2575. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i2.995

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois.

Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4

Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

Hartzler-Miller, C. (2001). Making sense of “best practice” in teaching history. Theory & Research in Social Education, 29(4), 672–695.

Kagan, S., & Kagan, M. (2009). Kagan cooperative learning. Kagan Publishing.

Kaliappen, N., Ismail, W. N. A., Ghani, A. B. A., & Sulisworo, D. (2021). Wizer.me and Socrative as innovative teaching method tools: Integrating TPACK and social learning theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I3.21744

Kawuryan, S. P., Sayuti, S. A., & Aman, A. (2021). Critical thinking among fourth grade elementary students: A gender perspective. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.44322

Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion. University of Maryland College of Education.

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215

Molenda, M. (2015). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

National Council for the Social Studies. (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment. Author.

Odebiyi, O. M., & Odebiyi, A. T. (2021). Critical thinking in social contexts: A trajectory analysis of states’ K–5 social studies content standards. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(4), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2021.05.002

Oktafiani, R., Suci, E. W., Kesumawardani, A. D., & Puspitasari, N. A. (2024). The effect of the Think-Pair-Share learning model assisted by augmented reality media on the critical thinking skills of class XI students. E3S Web of Conferences, 482, 05007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448205007

Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Pitriyana, S., & Arafatun, S. K. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SD kelas VI. Cendekiawan, 4(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.35438/cendekiawan.v4i2.303

Prasasti, R. D., & Anas, N. (2023). Pengembangan media digital berbasis flipbook untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis pada peserta didik. Munaddhomah, 4(3), 694–705. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i3.589

Sapriya. (2009). Pendidikan IPS: Konsep dan pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Soemantri, N. (2001). Menggagas pembaharuan pendidikan IPS. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suprijono, A., & Abbas, E. W. (2025). Metacognition and cooperative learning based on deliberative democracy moderated by learning style toward critical thinking skill in social studies learning. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2458915

Swai, C. T. (2025). A systematic review of classroom technologies supporting student-centered teaching. Discover Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00932-6

ten Dam, G., & Volman, M. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: Teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.005

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Widodo, S. A., Hidayat, W., Ekawati, R., Irfan, M., & Maarif, S. (2025). The importance of creating mathematical worksheets and their impact on critical and creative thinking skills. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17487

Zevin, J. (2023). Social studies for the twenty-first century. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003026235

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21