Process Output Gaps in Educational Performance Across Bali: A Regional Typology for Targeted Education Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62238/jupsi.v4i2.463Keywords:
educational performance, educational policy, process output gap, regional typologyAbstract
Regional education evaluation often emphasizes overall performance rankings, which may obscure whether favorable educational processes are consistently aligned with student outcomes. This study examines process–output alignment across Bali’s nine local government territories using data from Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2025. A quantitative evaluative-comparative, cross-sectional design was employed. Nine educational process indicators and three output indicators were transformed from ordinal categories into standardized scores, aggregated into a Process Index (PI) and Output Index (OI), and used to calculate process–output gaps. Spearman’s rank correlation and a median-based four-quadrant typology were then applied. The results show substantial territorial variation. The OI exceeded the PI in all regions, with the largest gaps observed in Klungkung, Bangli, and Jembrana, while Buleleng showed the closest numerical alignment. The PI and OI were moderately positively associated (ρ = 0.552, p = 0.123, n = 9), although the relationship was not statistically significant. The typology identified consolidated performance, educational resilience, conversion gaps, and structural vulnerability. These findings support differentiated regional education policy, while interpretation remains limited by cross-sectional aggregated data and ordinal score transformation.
Evaluasi pendidikan daerah sering menekankan peringkat kinerja secara keseluruhan, sehingga dapat mengaburkan apakah kondisi proses pendidikan yang baik benar-benar selaras dengan capaian siswa. Penelitian ini menganalisis keselarasan proses–output pada sembilan wilayah pemerintah daerah di Bali menggunakan data Rapor Pendidikan Indonesia 2025. Penelitian menggunakan desain kuantitatif evaluatif-komparatif dengan pendekatan cross-sectional. Sembilan indikator proses dan tiga indikator output ditransformasikan dari kategori ordinal menjadi skor terstandar, kemudian diagregasikan ke dalam Process Index (PI) dan Output Index (OI), serta digunakan untuk menghitung process–output gap. Analisis dilanjutkan dengan korelasi peringkat Spearman dan tipologi empat kuadran berbasis median. Hasil menunjukkan adanya variasi kewilayahan yang cukup jelas. Nilai OI lebih tinggi daripada PI di seluruh wilayah, dengan gap terbesar di Klungkung, Bangli, dan Jembrana, sedangkan Buleleng menunjukkan keselarasan numerik terdekat. PI dan OI memiliki hubungan positif sedang (ρ = 0,552; p = 0,123; n = 9), tetapi tidak signifikan secara statistik. Tipologi menghasilkan kategori consolidated performance, educational resilience, conversion gap, dan structural vulnerability. Temuan ini mendukung kebijakan pendidikan daerah yang lebih terdiferensiasi, dengan keterbatasan pada data agregat cross-sectional dan transformasi skor ordinal.
References
Aditia, R., & Széll, K. (2025). Belonging matters: How context and inequalities shape student achievement in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 9, 100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100512
Bardach, L., Röhl, S., Oczlon, S., Schumacher, A., Lüftenegger, M., Lavelle-Hill, R., Schwarzenthal, M., & Zitzmann, S. (2024). Cultural diversity climate in school: A meta-analytic review of its relationships with intergroup, academic, and socioemotional outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 150(12), 1397–1439. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000454
Baysu, G., Agirdag, O., & De Leersnyder, J. (2023). The Association Between Perceived Discriminatory Climate in School and Student Performance in Math and Reading: A Cross-National Analysis Using PISA 2018. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(3), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01712-3
Cipriano, C., Strambler, M. J., Naples, L. H., Ha, C., Kirk, M., Wood, M., Sehgal, K., Zieher, A. K., Eveleigh, A., McCarthy, M., Funaro, M., Ponnock, A., Chow, J. C., & Durlak, J. (2023). The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions. Child Development, 94(5), 1181–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13968
de Winter, J. C. F., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2016). Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000079
Enchikova, E., Neves, T., Toledo, C., & Nata, G. (2024). Change in socioeconomic educational equity after 20 years of PISA: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 100359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100359
Erdem, C., & Kaya, M. (2024). The relationship between school and classroom climate, and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. School Psychology International, 45(4), 380–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343231202923
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9
Gümüş, S., Bellibas, M. S., & Pietsch, M. (2022). School leadership and achievement gaps based on socioeconomic status: a search for socially just instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2021-0213
Kelemen, A., Szabó, Z. K., Bozóki, S., Szádoczki, Z., & Hartvig, Á. D. (2024). A sensitivity analysis of composite indicators: Min/max thresholds. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 23, 100453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100453
Kende, J., Green, E. G. T., & Phalet, K. (2024). Social and institutional inclusion in multi-ethnic schools enable better intergroup relations for majority youth and higher school achievement for minority youth. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 103, 102088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102088
Levinson, M., Geron, T., & Brighouse, H. (2022). Conceptions of educational equity. Aera Open, 8, 23328584221121344.
Pamularsih, N. (2022). The effects of school climate on students’ reading achievement. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100375
Perales, F., Johnstone, M., Xiang, N., & Tomaszewski, W. (2023). Explaining achievement gaps between students from regional and metropolitan areas: Accounting for socio-demographic and school climate factors. Australian Journal of Education, 67(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441231152943
Rahmi, I., & Rassanjani, S. (2025). Enhancing teacher quality in Indonesia: The impact of teacher professional development on achieving sustainable development goal 4.c. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102123
Rakhmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2022). The circumstances of literacy numeracy skill: Between notion and fact from elementary school students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.36427
Rawlings, B. S., Davis, H. E., Anum, A., Burger, O., Chen, L., Castro Morales, J. C., Dutra, N., Dzabatou, A., Dzokoto, V., Erut, A., Fong, F. T. K., Ghelardi, S., Goldwater, M., Ingram, G., Messer, E., Kingsford, J., Lew-Levy, S., Mendez, K., Newhouse, M., … Legare, C. H. (2024). Quantifying quality: The impact of measures of school quality on children’s academic achievement across diverse societies. Developmental Science, 27(5), e13434. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13434
Shi, C., & Land, K. C. (2021). The Data Envelopment Analysis and Equal Weights/Minimax Methods of Composite Social Indicator Construction: a Methodological Study of Data Sensitivity and Robustness. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(4), 1689–1716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09841-2
Supriyana, H., & Lestari, S. (2023). Pengembangan Iklim Sekolah melalui Penerapan Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi, Manajemen Dan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, 5(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.21831/jump.v5i1.60745
Wang, M.-T., Degol, J. L., Amemiya, J., Parr, A. K., & Guo, J. (2020). Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 57, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912
Waruwu, E., Sitanggang, N., & Sinaga, O. (2024). Participatory and Inclusive Environment Improves Student Academic Achievement. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v7i1.71840
Yang, M., & Lee, H. J. (2022). Do school resources reduce socioeconomic achievement gap? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 102528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102528
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizka Zakiah, Dita Puruwita, Annisa Lutfia (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Indonesia
.png)
